The Effectiveness of Edpuzzle-Based Interactive Video on Fifth Grade Students’ Learning Outcomes in Fact and Opinion Materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v15i01.1709Keywords:
interactive video; Edpuzzle; facts and opinions; multimedia learning.Abstract
Distinguishing fact from opinion is an essential information literacy skill for elementary students, yet achievement in Indonesia remains below minimum standards because instruction relies predominantly on text-based media. This study developed, validated, and tested the initial effectiveness of an Edpuzzle-based interactive video for fact-and-opinion instruction in Grade 5. Development followed the ADDIE model and applied principles of generative processing from the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning through embedded questions and formative feedback. Three experts assessed content validity using Aiken’s V. Instrument quality was evaluated through item validity, KR-20 reliability, difficulty index, and discrimination index. Effectiveness was tested using a one-group pretest–posttest design (n = 35) with a paired-samples t-test, Cohen’s d, and normalized gain (N-Gain). Content validity yielded Aiken's V = 0.793, KR-20 reliability = 0.880, and a student response rate of 90.89%. Posttest scores (M = 83.83) were significantly higher than pretest scores (M = 62.37): t(34) = 26.80, p < .001, Cohen’s d = 2.14, N-Gain = 0.60 (moderate gain). The video medium is effective as an initial instructional intervention for Grade 5 fact-and-opinion learning. Future studies should adopt quasi-experimental designs with a control group, incorporate performance-based assessment, and include
References
Adler Berg, F S, T E Lundtofte, L Heiselberg, and L Frischlich. “Children and Digital Misinformation: A Scoping Review.” Global Studies of Childhood, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106251398608.
Aiken, Lewis R. “Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 45, no. 1 (1985): 131–42.
Anastasiades, Panagiotes S., George Filippousis, Labros Karvunis, Spiros Siakas, Arsitokritos Tomazinakis, Panagiota Giza, and Hellen Mastoraki. “Interactive Videoconferencing for Collaborative Learning at a Distance in the School of 21st Century: A Case Study in Elementary Schools in Greece.” Computers and Education 54, no. 2 (2010): 321–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.016.
Anderson-Cook, Christine M. “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference.” Taylor & Francis, 2005.
Beal, C R. “The Development of Text Evaluation and Revision Skills.” Child Development 61, no. 1 (1990): 247–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02776.x.
Beal, C R, A C Garrod, and G J Bonitatibus. “Fostering Children’s Revision Skills Through Training in Comprehension Monitoring.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82, no. 2 (1990): 275–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.275.
Best, Rachel M, Randy G Floyd, and Danielle S McNamara. “Differential Competencies Contributing to Children’s Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Texts.” Reading Psychology 29, no. 2 (2008): 137–64.
Blakston, Angela, Simon Chambers, and Tanya Notley. “Young People, Algorithms and News: Exploring the Relationship between Algorithmic Literacy and News Literacy.” Journal of Youth Studies, 2025, 1–17.
Branch, Robert Maribe, and İlhan Varank. Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Vol. 722. Springer, 2009.
Cáceres, S Q. “Motion Graphics and Edpuzzle as Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom: An Experience in the Teaching-Learning Process of a Theoretical Subject in Industrial Design.” International Journal of Technologies in Learning 28, no. 2 (2021): 63–77. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/V28I02/63-77.
Deng, R, S Feng, and S Shen. “Improving the Effectiveness of Video-Based Flipped Classrooms with Question-Embedding.” Education and Information Technologies 29, no. 10 (2024): 12677–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12303-5.
Dewanda, F, A I Suroso, and N Hasanah. “Students’ Adoption of Educational Technology Platforms for Nonformal Education in Indonesia.” Information Development, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241312161.
Dusanek, Vincent, and Ingo Kollar. “Interactive Educational Videos to Learn about Psychological Theories: Effects of Learner Control and Feedback Features on Extraneous Cognitive Load and Knowledge Acquisition.” Psychology Learning & Teaching 25, no. 1 (2026): 35–57.
Escobar, J.-P., and V Espinoza. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Inhibition, Working Memory and Cognitive Flexibility on Reading Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Texts: Same or Different Effects?” Reading and Writing Quarterly 41, no. 2 (2025): 176–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2024.2400993.
Fiorella, Logan, and Richard E Mayer. Learning as a Generative Activity. Cambridge university press, 2015.
Gikandi, Joyce Wangui, Donna Morrow, and Niki E Davis. “Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.” Computers & Education 57, no. 4 (2011): 2333–51.
Hake, Richard. “R.(1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. AREA-D American Education Research Association’s Devision. D.” Measurement and Reasearch Methodology 1, no. 4 (1999): 48–56.
Mayer, R E. “The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 36, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1.
Mayer, Richard E. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge university press, 2005.
Mischel, Leann J. “Watch and Learn? Using EDpuzzle to Enhance the Use of Online Videos.” Management Teaching Review 4, no. 3 (2019): 283–89.
Mullis, Ina V S, and Michael O Martin. PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. ERIC, 2019.
Noetel, M, S Griffith, O Delaney, N R Harris, T Sanders, P Parker, B del Pozo Cruz, and C Lonsdale. “Multimedia Design for Learning: An Overview of Reviews With Meta-Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 92, no. 3 (2022): 413–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329.
Po, Lovelyn, Dame Francis Louise Ersando, Doreen Homecillo, Flordelis Quitara, Maria Jessca Amaquin, Abegail Quezon, Marie Zar Balanay, and Richard Mascardo. “Leveraging Tiered Instruction Strategy to Enhance Reading Comprehension and Quality Education: An Action Research among Early Elementary Learners in the Philippines.” Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal 13, no. 2 (2025): 35–42.
Ramasany, Vinohthini, Norah Md Noor, and Norasykin Mohd Zaid. “Effects of Learning Using Edpuzzle Interactive Video Application on Students’ Interest, Engagement and Achievement in Science Subjects.” Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal 6, no. 2 (2022): 59–72.
Riduwan. Pengantar Statistika Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.
Robledo-Castro, Carolina, Piedad Rocio Lerma Castaño, and Luis Gerardo Pachón Ospina. “Programas de Rehabilitación de Las Funciones Ejecutivas En La Adultez Joven y Media Basados En Sistemas Computacionales: Una Revisión de Alcance.” Revista de Investigación e Innovación En Ciencias de La Salud 5, no. 1 (2023): 231–72.
Santos, S, I Cadime, F L Viana, G Prieto, S Chaves-Sousa, A G Spinillo, and I Ribeiro. “An Application of the Rasch Model to Reading Comprehension Measurement.” Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica 29, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0044-6.
Sawilowsky, Shlomo S. “New Effect Size Rules of Thumb.” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8, no. 2 (2009): 26.
Su, C.-Y., and C.-H. Chiu. “Perceived Enjoyment and Attractiveness Influence Taiwanese Elementary School Students’ Intention to Use Interactive Video Learning.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 37, no. 6 (2021): 574–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841423.
Suharsimi, Arikunto. “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.” Jakarta: Rineka Cipta 134 (2006): 252.
Sundayana, Rostina. “Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan (Alfabeta,” 2016.
Suwarto, D H, B Setiawan, and S Machmiyah. “Developing Digital Literacy Practices in Yogyakarta Elementary Schools.” Electronic Journal of E-Learning 20, no. 2 (2022): 101–11. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.2.2602.
Torre, S La, and J C Désiron. “From Research to Practice: Are Multimedia Principles Present in Instructional Videos Used by Teachers in Science and History?” Technology, Knowledge and Learning 29, no. 4 (2024): 1993–2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09753-2.
Tweissi, Adiy. “The Effects of Embedded Questions Strategy in Video among Graduate Students at a Middle Eastern University.” Ohio University, 2016.
Xue, M, P Liu, J Zhang, Y Sun, Y Fang, J Yang, C Zeng, et al. “Does a Video-Based and 3D Animation Hybrid Learning System Improve Teaching Outcomes in Orthopedic Surgery? A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of Surgical Education 81, no. 9 (2024): 1305–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.05.015.
Zainil, M, Y Helsa, C Sutarsih, and S Nisa. “A Needs Analysis on the Utilization of Learning Management Systems as Blended Learning Media in Elementary School.” Journal of Education and E-Learning Research 11, no. 1 (2024): 56–65. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5310.
Zheng, H, R M Branch, L Ding, D Kim, E Jung, Z Lu, T Li, Z Pan, and M Yoon. “The Combination of Segmentation and Self-Explanation to Enhance Video-Based Learning.” Active Learning in Higher Education 25, no. 2 (2024): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221126920.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Millah Fithriyani, Lukman Nulhakim, Ratna Sari Dewi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

.png)

