Enhancing PGMI Students’ Conceptual Understanding through a Contextual Teaching and Learning-Based Science E-Module

Authors

  • Fitriyah Ika Astutik IAI Al-Khairat Pamekasan
  • Fitri Nur Rohmah Institut Agama Islam Al-Khairat Pamekasan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32806/islamentary.v4i1.1644

Keywords:

Science E-Module, Contextual Teaching And Learning, Conceptual Understanding, PGMI, ADDIE.

Abstract

This study aims to develop a science e-module based on Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) to improve the conceptual understanding of students of the PGMI Study Program of IAI Al-Khairat Pamekasan. This study uses the Research and Development (R&D) method with the ADDIE model which includes the stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The subjects of the study were PGMI IAI Al-Khairat Pamekasan students taking the Science Study course in the 4th semester of 2025. Research data were collected through observation, interviews, questionnaires, and tests. The instruments used included expert validation sheets, student response questionnaires, and pretest and posttest questions. Data were analyzed using the Aiken's V index to test validity, percentage analysis to measure practicality, and N-gain to determine product effectiveness. The results showed that the developed e-module obtained an average validity of 0.87 with a very valid category. The results of the practicality test showed a percentage of 86.75% with a very practical category. The results of the effectiveness test showed an increase in students' conceptual understanding, marked by an increase in the average pretest score from 61.42 to 84.28 in the posttest, with an N-gain value of 0.59 in the moderate category. Based on these results, the CTL-based Science e-module was declared valid, practical, and effective for use in Science Studies learning. This e-module is expected to be an alternative digital teaching material that supports independent, interactive, and contextual learning for PGMI students.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142.

Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., Jr., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103327.

Asrizal, Nazifah, N., Effendi, H., & Helma. (2024). STEM-Smart physics e-module to promote conceptual understanding and 4C skills of students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(2), 279–286.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.

Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19–26.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Halim, A., Mahzum, E., Yacob, M., Irwandi, I., & Halim, L. (2021). The impact of narrative feedback, e-learning modules and realistic video and the reduction of misconception. Education Sciences, 11(4), 158.

Hidayat, E., Marwoto, P., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2024). The effectiveness of contextual-approach science e-module integrated with local wisdom on pressure topic to improve critical thinking skills. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 13(2).

Kustantia, E., Miarsyah, M., & Sigit, D. V. (2023). Enhancing student conceptual understanding and critical thinking through SETS-based digital modules on environmental changes. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 9(3), 359–370.

Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Johnson, M. (2018). Conceptual change in science teaching and learning: Introducing the dynamic model of conceptual change. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 151–195.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes—Indonesia. OECD Publishing.

Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 155–167.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Astutik, F. I., & Nur Rohmah, F. (2026). Enhancing PGMI Students’ Conceptual Understanding through a Contextual Teaching and Learning-Based Science E-Module. Journal of Islamic Elementary Education, 4(1), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.32806/islamentary.v4i1.1644

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.