AUTHOR GUIDELINES

 


Author Guidelines

The Author Guidelines can be downloaded here

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS

  1. Papers:

Bordering Islamic Education, 

Non-plagiarism, 

Never been and never been published in other journals, 

Prioritized based on empirical research, 

Written in English (using Microsoft Word, Garamond 12, 1 space, A-4) or Arabic (Microsoft World, Traditional Arabic 14, 1 space),

Send to: https://jurnalalkhairat.org/ojs/index.php/investi/index

  1. The identity of the paper is required; title, author's full name, affiliation,

    email, abstract (minimum 200 words containing; objectives, methods, research results, conclusions, impact), and keywords (3-5 words).

  1. The content of the empirical research paper consists of Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion, Conclusion, and Bibliography.
  2. The introduction, which consists of background, literature review (to compile the state of the art), objectives and problem formulation, is written in one chapter without subheadings.
  3. The method consists of a description of the type of research, data collection, data sources, data types, and data analysis. Written in paragraph form.
  4. Results and Discussion informs a number of important (original) field data obtained from questionnaires, surveys, documents, interviews, observations and other data collection techniques. It may be supplemented with tables or graphs to clarify the results. All figures and tables should be centred and numbered consecutively. Tables (see Table 1, Table 2,...) should be presented above the table on the centre line. Descriptive headings are placed after the table headings (see Table 1, Table 2,...) above each table. The source of the table should be placed on the table in the correct alignment. Figures and tables must be mentioned in the corresponding text.

  5. Conclusion: write the research results concisely and clearly then describe the logical consequences in the development of science and Islamic education praxis. Conclusions are not indented and use Garamond 12 in bold.
  6. Bibliography consists of references and citations referring to the APA style

    sixth edition by using a reference manager (Mendeley/Zotero/Endnote).

  1. Arabic to Latin transliteration refers to the Arabic to Latin model.

Library of Congress Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check their submissions for compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors who do not adhere to these guidelines.

  1. On the limits of Islamic education,
  2. Non plagiarism
  3. The submission has not been previously published, nor has it been submitted to another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  4. Submission file in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
  5. The text adheres to the style and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which can be found in About the Journal.

Copyright Notice

Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The author retains copyright and grants first publication rights to the journal with the work simultaneously licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0) which permits others to share the work with acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors may enter into a separate, additional contractual agreement for non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the journal (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of the work's initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process, as this can result in productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Impact of Open Access).

Privacy Statement

Investi: Journal of Economics and Banking is a peer-reviewed international journal, available in print and online and published twice a year. This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including authors, editor-in-chief, Editorial Board, peer-reviewers and publisher (LP2M Institut Agama Islam Al-Khairat, Pamekasan). This statement is based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors

Author Free of Charge

Authors are free of charge for submission, editing, or publication.

Peer Review Process

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Manuscript articles submitted online to Investi Journal: Journal of Economics and Banking will be checked by the editorial board regarding scope, in-house style, plagiarism. Manuscripts that meet the focus and scope of the Journal of Economics and Banking will proceed to the review process which will at least be reviewed by reviewers with a double blind commitment. Reviewers are journal partners consisting of experts who concentrate on the journal field. The editor will send an email to selected reviewers regarding the title and content of the manuscript, as well as an invitation to log in to the journal website to complete the review process. Reviewers log in to the journal website to approve the review, download the manuscript, send their comments, and select recommendations. The review process by reviewers is conducted in a minimum of two weeks. The results will be returned to the authors for follow-up. Eligible papers will be published in Indonesian.

Accuracy

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in the manuscript or knows that prompt review is not possible should notify the editor and request permission from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. It should not be shown or discussed with others except with the permission of the editor.

Objectivity Standard

The review should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also bring to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider a manuscript that has a conflict of interest caused by a competitive, collaborative or other relationship or connection with any author, company or institution associated with the paper.

Open Access Policy

The journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge exchange.

Archiving

The journal uses the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and allows those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for preservation and restoration purposes. More

Publication Ethics Statement

Investi: Journal of Economics and Banking (P-ISSN: 2807-9051; E-ISSN: 2686-5637) is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Faculty of EBIS and Institut Agama Islam Al-Khairat, Pamekasan. This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of posting articles in this journal, including authors, editor-in-chief, Editorial Board, peer-reviewers, and publishers. This statement is based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines

Publication of articles in Investi Journal: A peer-reviewed Journal of Economics and Banking is an important cornerstone in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the author's work and the institution that supports it. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on expected standards of ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers, publishers, and the public. 

The EBIS Faculty of Al-Khairat Pamekasan Islamic Institute as the publisher of Investi: Journal of Economics and Banking takes its duty of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously, and we recognise its ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprinting, or additional commercial revenue does not impact or influence editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of EBIS, Al-Khairat Pamekasan Institute of Islamic Religion, and the Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and publishers when beneficial and necessary.

Publication decision

The editor of Investi: Journal of Economics and Banking are responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validity of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive the decision. The editors may be guided by the journal's editorial board policy and constrained by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making these decisions.

Fair Play

An editor evaluates manuscripts at all times based on their intellectual content without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the associated authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts must not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

Duties of Peer Reviewers

Contributions to Editorial Decisions

Peer reviewers assist the editor in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communication with the authors, can also help authors improve their manuscripts.

Timeliness

Any peer reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in the manuscript or knows that a timely review is not possible should notify the editor and excuse themselves from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be considered as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
The review process should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Peer reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument reported should be accompanied by the appropriate citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Peer reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original actions and if the authors have used the works, or words of others that this has appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same paper concurrently to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be provided. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
1.    If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
2.    The confidential and anonymous treatment of human participants’ data is considered the norm for the conduct of research. Authors should recognise the entitlement of both institutions and individual participants to privacy, and should accord them their rights to confidentiality and anonymity. This could involve employing ‘fictionalising’ approaches when reporting, and where using such approaches researchers should fully explain how and why they have done so. However, in some circumstances individual participants, or their guardians or responsible others, may want to specifically and willingly waive their right to confidentiality and anonymity: researchers should recognise participants’ rights to be identified in any publication of their original works or other inputs if they so wish. This statement baseb on the ethical guidance of the privacy and data storage from BERA Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (4th ed.)
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published work

When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his or her published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Plagiarism Checker

To avoid plagiarism, every submitted manuscript will be screened by Turnitin and Premium Grammarly®.

Retraction

Articles published in Investi: Journal of Economics and Banking will be considered retracted in publication if:

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of errors (e.g. data falsification) or honest mistakes (e.g. miscalculations or experimental errors)
  2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without cross-referencing, permission or justification (i.e. a case of over-publication)
  3. constitutes plagiarism
  4. reports unethical research

The retraction mechanism follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Retraction Guidelines which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf

 Conflict of Interest Statement

Author

According to the general publication policy of Investi: Journal of Economics and Banking only researchers who contribute to the work in the true sense should be considered authors. Authors should be responsible for disclosing all personal and financial relationships, which might bias their work. Financial relationships such as employment, consulting, shareholding, honoraria, and paid expert testimony can be classified as conflicts of interest that are most easily identified and most likely to undermine the credibility of the journal. To clarify conflict of interest issues, authors should send a letter to the editorial office accompanying the submitted manuscript and explicitly stating whether or not a potential conflict exists.

Peer Reviewer

Peer reviewers should be responsible for declining the review process if there is a substantial conflict of interest. If in doubt, they should consult the Editor to make a decision regarding the review process. Researchers from the author's institution should not be considered as peer reviewers to prevent conflicts of interest.

Editor

Editors should be responsible for managing the review process and have the right to reject any submission in the event of a conflict of interest. They must not have any direct personal and/or financial conflicts with the manuscript assigned to them. They should not be included in the manuscript if they are on its author list.