Integrating Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology in the Development of Knowledge

Authors

  • Khaliq Imran Universitas Islam Alauddin Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
  • M. Sattu Alam Universitas Islam Alauddin Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32806/islamentary.v4i2.2658

Keywords:

Axiology; Epistemology; Philosophy Of Science; Ontology; Scientific Knowledge.

Abstract

The rapid development of knowledge raises fundamental questions concerning the reality investigated by science, the procedures through which valid knowledge is obtained, and the values that guide its application. These questions are addressed through ontology, epistemology, and axiology, three interrelated foundations of the philosophy of science. This article aims to explain the concepts, scopes, and principal schools of these three branches and to analyze their relationship as an integrated foundation for the development of knowledge. The study employs a qualitative library-research design and a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through documentation of books on the philosophy of science and relevant scholarly articles. The materials were reduced, classified into ontological, epistemological, and axiological themes, interpreted through comparison of the authors’ arguments, and synthesized to identify their conceptual relationships. The review indicates that ontology clarifies the nature and boundaries of the reality studied; epistemology explains the sources, methods, and justification of knowledge; and axiology evaluates the purposes, values, and consequences of its use through ethical and aesthetic considerations. Ontological assumptions influence the choice of epistemic methods, while the resulting knowledge requires axiological evaluation. In turn, social needs and ethical commitments can shape research questions and methodological choices. The article concludes that these dimensions should be understood as a connected framework so that scientific development remains coherent, meaningful, and responsible.

References

Abadi, T. W. (2016). Aksiologi: Antara etika, moral, dan estetika. KANAL: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.21070/kanal.v4i2.1452

Ardafianti, R. (2024). Pandangan Barat dan Islam terhadap filsafat, ilmu, dan pengetahuan. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(5), 198–208.

Bagus, L. (2005). Kamus filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bahrum, B. (2013). Ontologi, epistemologi dan aksiologi. Sulesana: Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman, 8(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.24252/.v8i2.1276

Bakhtiar, A. (2012). Filsafat ilmu. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Frondizi, R. (2001). Pengantar filsafat nilai (C. A. Wijaya, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gie, T. L. (2007). Pengantar filsafat ilmu. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Hume, D. (2007). An enquiry concerning human understanding (P. Millican, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1748).

Kallabe, N. A., Munir, M., & Ismail, I. (2025). Nilai dan etika ilmu pengetahuan dalam perspektif aksiologi filsafat ilmu. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38808

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781).

Kattsoff, L. O. (2004). Pengantar filsafat (S. Soemargono, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mayasari, A., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2022). Aksiologi ilmu pengetahuan dan keislaman. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i1.401

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate.

Salsabila, A. N. (2026). Landasan filsafat ilmu modern: Eksplorasi ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(6), 2412–2420.

Surajiyo, S., & Dhika, H. (2024). Relasi ilmu dan etika: Sebuah kajian filsafat ilmu. IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 8(3), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-humaniora.v8i3.4192

Suriasumantri, J. S. (2013). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Tafsir, A. (2012). Filsafat ilmu: Mengurai ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi pengetahuan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05

How to Cite

Imran, K., & Sattu Alam, M. (2026). Integrating Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology in the Development of Knowledge. Journal of Islamic Elementary Education, 4(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.32806/islamentary.v4i2.2658