Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.32806/jkpi.v7i3.2248
Submitted: 18-07-2026
Published: 03-11-2026

DIGITAL EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION AND PROBLEMATIC GADGET USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR SDG 4 AND THE ROLE OF MINANGKABAU LOCAL WISDOM IN INDONESIA

Universitas Negeri Yigyakarta
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
digital education, problematic smartphone use, digital well-being, SDG 4, digital literacy, Minangkabau local wisdom

Abstract

Digital transformation has expanded the possibilities for educational access, communication, and learning resource development. Yet, the educational value of connected devices depends on how, why, and under what conditions they are used. This critical narrative review examines the relationship between digital education transformation, problematic gadget use among school-age learners, and the implications for Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4), with particular attention to the potential contribution of Minangkabau local wisdom expressed in the philosophy Adat Basandi Syarak, Syarak Basandi Kitabullah (ABS-SBK). The review synthesizes literature on problematic smartphone use, learning and attention, digital literacy, school-based technology integration, parental mediation, and culturally grounded character education. The literature indicates that educational technology is not inherently beneficial or harmful: purposeful, teacher-guided use can support learning, whereas off-task, prolonged, and poorly regulated use is associated with distraction and less favourable academic and psychosocial outcomes. These relationships are shaped by individual self-regulation, family practices, school norms, and unequal access to supportive learning environments. The review maps these concerns onto SDG 4 targets 4.1, 4.4, and 4.7 and argues that progress should be assessed not by device access alone but by the quality, equity, safety, and educational relevance of digital participation. It proposes a context-sensitive framework combining digital literacy, pedagogical mediation, family–school partnership, and ABS-SBK-informed ethical reflection. Because the study is a narrative review rather than a systematic review or empirical investigation, the framework should be treated as a conceptual proposition requiring validation in diverse Indonesian educational settings.

References

  1. Akhyar, M., Deliani, N., Batubara, J., & Gusli, R. A. (2023). Studi analisis pendidikan Budaya Alam Minangkabau terhadap pembentukan karakter anak di sekolah dasar. Idarah Tarbawiyah: Journal of Management in Islamic Education, 4(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.32832/itjmie.v4i2.15396
  2. Al-Nuaimi, S. R., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2022). Sustainable consumption and education for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, 14(12), Article 7255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127255
  3. Albert, A., Iswantir, I., Ismail, F., & Zainir, Z. (2022). Gagasan integrasi nilai-nilai Adat Basandi Syarak Syarak Basandi Kitabullah (ABS SBK) ke dalam pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam pada kurikulum sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(11), 1002–1013. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v3i11.1286
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  5. Ampuni, S., Kautsari, N., Maharani, M., Kuswardani, S., & Buwono, S. B. S. (2020). Academic dishonesty in Indonesian college students: An investigation from a moral psychology perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 395–417.
  6. Asriati, N. (2012). Mengembangkan karakter peserta didik berbasis kearifan lokal melalui pembelajaran di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora, 3(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.26418/j-psh.v3i2.3663
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Proporsi individu yang menguasai/memiliki telepon genggam menurut kelompok umur, 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTIyMiMy/proporsi-individu-yang-menguasai-memiliki-telepon-genggam-menurut-kelompok-umur.html
  8. Basith, A., Rahman, M. S., & Moseki, U. R. (2021). College students’ academic procrastination during the COVID-19 pandemic: Focusing on academic achievement. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 6(3), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v6i32021p112-120
  9. Fajria, R., & Fitrisia, A. (2024). Tinjauan literatur falsafah adat Minangkabau: Adat Basandi Syarak, Syarak Basandi Kitabullah. Journal of Education Research, 5(2), 1811–1816. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i2.994
  10. Karabey, S. C., Palanci, A., & Turan, Z. (2024). How does smartphone addiction affect the lives of adolescents socially and academically? A systematic review study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 29(3), 631–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2023.2229241
  11. Kosasih, A. V. N. A., Sarbini, S., & Mulyana, A. (2021). Leisure boredom dan religiusitas: Pengaruhnya terhadap kecenderungan adiksi internet. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 8(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v8i1.12352
  12. Kurnia, N., & Astuti, S. I. (2017). Peta gerakan literasi digital di Indonesia: Studi tentang pelaku, ragam kegiatan, kelompok sasaran dan mitra yang dilakukan oleh JAPELIDI. Informasi: Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi, 47(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v47i2.16079
  13. Kwon, M., Lee, J.-Y., Won, W.-Y., Park, J.-W., Min, J.-A., Hahn, C., Gu, X., Choi, J.-H., & Kim, D.-J. (2013a). Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLOS ONE, 8(2), Article e56936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056936
  14. Kwon, M., Kim, D.-J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013b). The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLOS ONE, 8(12), Article e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
  15. Ma’ruf, F., Pattiasina, P. J., Setiawati, R., Camerling, B. C. F., & Tuasela, P. E. (2024). The influence of social media usage, internet access, and mobile device penetration on social interaction quality among adolescents in Indonesia. The Eastasouth Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1(3), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.58812/esssh.v1i03.275
  16. Marini, L., Hendriani, W., & Wulandari, P. Y. (2024). Gambaran problematic smartphone use pada remaja. Psikobuletin: Buletin Ilmiah Psikologi, 5(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.24014/pib.v5i1.26477
  17. Mustansyir, R., & Munir, M. (2009). Konsep urang sabana urang dalam pepatah adat Minangkabau. Jurnal Filsafat, 19(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.3445
  18. Nastiti, F. E., & ’Abdu, A. R. N. (2020). Kesiapan pendidikan Indonesia menghadapi era Society 5.0. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v5i12020p61
  19. Nielsen, P., Favez, N., Liddle, H., & Rigter, H. (2019). Linking parental mediation practices to adolescents’ problematic online screen use: A systematic literature review. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 8(4), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.61
  20. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume II): Learning during—and from—disruption. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en
  21. Paterna, A., Alcaraz-Ibáñez, M., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Salavera, C., Demetrovics, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2024). Problematic smartphone use and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 13(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2024.00014
  22. Ramdani, E. (2018). Model pembelajaran kontekstual berbasis kearifan lokal sebagai penguatan pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(1), 1–10.
  23. Rosenberg, K. P., & Feder, L. C. (Eds.). (2014). Behavioral addictions: Criteria, evidence, and treatment. Academic Press.
  24. Safitri, A. O., Yunianti, V. D., & Rostika, D. (2022). Upaya peningkatan pendidikan berkualitas di Indonesia: Analisis pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 7096–7106. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3296
  25. Salim, H., Waterworth, P. G., Daud, A., Dahnilsyah, & Hanif, M. (2023). The integration of digital technologies into practicum classrooms by smartphone-savvy pre-service teachers in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.593
  26. Satria, D., & Sahayu, W. (2022). Alam takambang jadi guru: Menelisik falsafah pendidikan berbasis kearifan lokal di Minangkabau. Vokal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.33830/vokal.v1i2.3160
  27. Sun, R., Gao, Q., & Xiang, Y. (2022). Perceived parental monitoring of smartphones and problematic smartphone use in adolescents: Mediating roles of self-efficacy and self-control. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(12), 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0040
  28. Tamala, N., Sahrani, R., & Dewi, F. I. R. (2024). Tantangan digital: Prokrastinasi akademik dan penggunaan smartphone pada remaja SMA. Psyche 165 Journal, 17(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v17i2.359
  29. Tohani, E. (2020). Hubungan dialektis pendidikan dan pembangunan. UNY Press.
  30. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144.
  31. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
  32. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.
  33. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.
  34. Wang, F., Ni, X., Zhang, M., & Zhang, J. (2024). Educational digital inequality: A meta-analysis of the relationship between digital device use and academic performance in adolescents. Computers & Education, 213, Article 105003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105003
  35. Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 32–37.
  36. World Health Organization. (2019). Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. World Health Organization.
  37. Wulandari, I., Handoyo, E., Yulianto, A., Sumartiningsih, S., & Fuchs, P. X. (2024). Integrasi nilai kearifan lokal dalam pendidikan karakter siswa di era globalisasi. Pendekar: Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 7(4), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.31764/pendekar.v7i4.27062
  38. Yuliana, E., Nirmala, S. D., & Ardiasih, L. S. (2023). Pengaruh literasi digital guru dan lingkungan belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4196
  39. Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (3rd ed.). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia

How to Cite

Habib, M., Yuliantri, R. D. A., & Agustinova, D. E. (2026). DIGITAL EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION AND PROBLEMATIC GADGET USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR SDG 4 AND THE ROLE OF MINANGKABAU LOCAL WISDOM IN INDONESIA. Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.32806/jkpi.v7i3.2248