Abstract
Although inclusive education is increasingly recognized as a rights-based approach to educational equity, the presence of students with disabilities in mainstream classrooms does not by itself guarantee social inclusion. Peer acceptance, everyday interaction, and the capacity of schools to cultivate supportive relationships are central to students’ experiences of belonging. This study examines how an inclusive education program was implemented and how it shaped social acceptance of students with disabilities at SD Inpres Mallengkeri 2 Makassar, Indonesia. A qualitative case-study design was used. Data were generated through in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and document analysis involving the principal, classroom teachers, special education support teachers, students without disabilities, students with disabilities, and parents. Data were analyzed iteratively through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing, with source and method triangulation and member checking used to strengthen credibility. The findings indicate that inclusive practices were associated with more frequent peer interaction, cooperation, and expressions of empathy toward students with disabilities. Teachers and special education support teachers functioned not only as instructional actors but also as social mediators who modelled acceptance, managed interpersonal tensions, and facilitated collaborative participation. At the same time, social acceptance was uneven, particularly for students experiencing communication or behavioural difficulties. Limited specialist support, insufficient teacher preparation, adaptive-resource constraints, and disability-related stereotypes beyond the school remained important barriers. The study suggests that meaningful inclusion depends not only on placement and access but also on the quality of relational processes within the school. The findings contribute context-sensitive evidence on the social dimension of inclusive education in an Indonesian primary-school setting.
References
- Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
- Florian, L., & Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.778111
- Subban, P., Woodcock, S., Sharma, U., & May, F. (2022). Student experiences of inclusive education in secondary schools: A systematic review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103853
- UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989
- Wüthrich, S., Sahli Lozano, C., Lüthi, M., & Wicki, M. (2024). Changing students’ explicit and implicit attitudes toward peers with disabilities: Effects of a curriculum-based intervention programme. Social Psychology of Education, 27, 935–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09837-4
- Wang, Z., Huang, J., Wang, L., & Liu, C. (2025). Social participation for students with special needs in inclusive schools: A scoping review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 71(5), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2023.2277602
- Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2003). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2003 on the National Education System.
- Ministry of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Regulation of the Minister of National Education Number 70 of 2009 on inclusive education for students with potential intelligence and/or special talents and/or disabilities