Abstract
This study aims to develop a valid, reliable, and practical Google Form-based Personality Typology Instrument for students at SMP Negeri 3 Mapilli. The background of this study is based on the results of a needs analysis that shows the limitations of personality assessment instruments in schools and the low level of students' understanding of their personality types and learning styles. These conditions have an impact on students' difficulty in understanding lesson material and low level of learning independence. Therefore, a personality assessment instrument that is easy to use, efficient, and suitable for the characteristics of students in the digital era is needed. This study uses the research and development method. The development procedure includes the stages of needs analysis, planning, prototype instrument development, validation by subject matter experts and media experts, product revision, and practical testing. The test subjects involved students and homeroom teachers of SMP Negeri 3 Mapilli. Data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, and observation sheets, then analyzed descriptively, quantitatively, and qualitatively. The results showed that the developed instrument had an excellent level of validity, with an average expert validation percentage of 85 percent, placing it in the highly valid category. The practicality test showed high results, with an achievement percentage between 80 and 99 percent, which falls into the practical to highly practical category. These findings indicate that the instrument is easy to use and accepted by users. Thus, the Google Form-based Personality Typology Instrument is declared suitable for use as a student personality assessment tool to support more effective, adaptive, and individual-oriented learning.
References
- Azwar, S. (2017). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
- Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman.
- Hasbullah. (2012). Dasar-dasar ilmu pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
- Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta.
- Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles of marketing. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
- Munir. (2017). Pembelajaran digital. Bandung: Alfabeta.
- Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational assessment of students. Boston: Pearson
- OECD. (2019). Trends shaping education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Prayitno, & Amti, E. (2015). Dasar-dasar bimbingan dan konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
- Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
- Robbins, S. P. (2008). Organizational behavior. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
- Santrock, J. W. (2018). Educational psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Pearson.
- Suyanto, & Jihad, A. (2013). Menjadi guru profesional. Jakarta: Erlangga.
- Wahyuni, S. (2020). Pemanfaatan Google Form sebagai media evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi, 5(2), 45–53.