PEER REVIEW POLICY

PEER REVIEW POLICY

THE PROCESS OF DETERMINATION AND ISSUANCE OF ARTICLE

  1. The decision whether or not to publish the manuscript is determined by the Editorial Board of Experts of the Currency (Journal of Sharia Economics and Banking) .
  2. Manuscripts that are reviewed are those that comply with the writing rules of the Currency (Journal of Sharia Economics and Banking) .
  3. The author is obliged to revise the manuscript according to the reviewer's suggestions.
  4. The review of manuscripts in the Currency (Journal of Sharia Economics and Banking)  is carried out using the (double-blind/blind peer-review method)
  5. The copyright of published manuscripts belongs to the Currency (Journal of Sharia Economics and Banking) .

The process of reviewing the manuscript from submission to publication of the manuscript is as follows:

Notes:

  1. Manuscripts that enter the Journal Currency will go through a screening stage by the editor, if the results of the screening exceed the provisions set by Currency (Journal of Sharia Economics and Banking) , the manuscript will be rejected and returned to the author.
  2. If the screening results are less than the provisions stipulated by Currency (Journal of Sharia Economics and Banking) , the manuscript will enter the next stage, namely the review stage by the reviewer.
  3. At this stage the reviewer will review the manuscript that passes the screening stage, and the results of the review will be sent by the reviewer to the editor to be conveyed to the author that the manuscript needs revision.
  4. The editor will send the manuscript that has been reviewed by the reviewer to be revised according to the results of the review to the author.
  5. Authors who have revised their manuscripts send the revised results to the editor for re-screening.
  6. The revision results that have been re-screened by the editor are returned to the reviewer, whether the revision results from the author are correct and per the results of the previous review.
  7. At this stage, the reviewer has the right to decide whether the manuscript is suitable for publication or still requires revision. The author's revised manuscript based on the reviewer's review will be reviewed by expert editors of the Journal CURRENCY based on their respective competencies. The approval of the publication is made based on the reviewer's consideration and the quality of the author's improvement results according to the advice of the reviewer:
  8. If the reviewer decides that the manuscript still needs revision, the manuscript will be returned by the reviewer to the editor which will then be returned by the editor to the author for revision.
  9. If the reviewer decides that the manuscript is suitable for publication, the manuscript will be continued to the next stage by the editor.

This stage is the final stage, after the reviewer and chief editor decide that the manuscript is worthy of publication, the technical editor will raise the status of the manuscript to publish.

Articles published in the Journal CURRENCY will be reviewed by double-blind review by at least two review partners.