Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.32806/jkpi.v6i3.923
Submitted: 28-05-2025
Published: 06-07-2025

ADOLESCENT EMOTIONS AND SKINCARE TEXTURE: A MIXED-METHODS EXPLORATORY STUDY

Universitas Gunadarma Jakarta
Translators
Institut Daarul Qur’an Jakarta
Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Universitas Islam Bandung
Universitas Alma Ata
Skincare Texture Emotion Adolescents

Abstract

This study explores the effect of skincare product texture on users’ emotional responses, especially female adolescents aged 16–21 years. Using mixed-method, quantitative and qualitative approach, this study is conducted in Jakarta, Tangerang, Bandung, Banyumas, and Yogyakarta. Total of 30 participants in this study follow three stages of product use: First Touch, During Application, and After-Absorption. Participants’ emotions are measured using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) for the dimensions of valence, arousal, and dominance, and also the PANAS scale to measure changes in positive and negative emotions before and after using the skincare product. The result shows that at the First Touch stage, there is no significant difference in emotions statistically. However, qualitative data reveal variations in perceptions of sticky or runny texture. At the During Application stage, softness shows a significant effect on the sense of control and positive emotions. Meanwhile, at the After-Absorption stage, stickiness, greasiness, and film residue have a significant effect. Product with a soft texture, fast absorption, and no residue (product 2) is the most preferred and show to significantly reduce negative emotions based on the PANAS scale. This study emphasizes the importance of considering texture in skincare product development, as sensory experiences play a role in shaping user emotions. Further research is recommended to explore ingredients such as humectants and occlusives, as well as using physiological tools such as facial coding or EEG to gain a more objective understanding.

References

  1. Andrei, F. (2025). Sensory science in cosmetics. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1009804
  2. Chen, H.-Y., & Jablonski, N. G. (2022). Deeper than the surface: Exploring symbolic cultural cues behind skin color among three groups of women of Chinese heritage. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 10(1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00124-9
  3. Courrèges, S., Aboulaasri, R., Bhatara, A., & Bardel, M. H. (2021). Crossmodal interactions between olfaction and touch affecting well-being and perception of cosmetic creams. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 703531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703531
  4. Feng, W., Zhang, H., Wang, R., Zhou, X., & Wang, T. (2021). Modifying the internal structures of steamed rice cakes by emulsifiers for promoted textural and sensory properties. Food Chemistry, 354, 129469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129469
  5. Gabriel, D., Merat, E., Jeudy, A., Cambos, S., Chabin, T., Giustiniani, J., & Haffen, E. (2021). Emotional effects induced by the application of a cosmetic product: A real-time electrophysiological evaluation. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 4766. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114766
  6. Guest, S., McGlone, F., Hopkinson, A., Schendel, Z., Blot, K., & Essick, G. (2013). Perceptual and sensory-functional consequences of skin care products. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, 3(1A), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcdsa.2013.31A010
  7. Habsy, B. A., Febiyanti, D., Arsalan, F. I. P., Maulana, H., & Arfianti, Y. P. (2024). BASIC CONCEPTS OF THE GROUP APPROACH IN GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Psikologi, 1(3 April), Article 3 April. https://doi.org/10.61397/jkpp.v1i3.122
  8. Herdyanti, L. Q., & Mansoor, A. Z. (2020). Analysing Opportunity for New Established Acne Focused Skincare Brand in Indonesian Beauty Industry. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.2.272
  9. Kim, M. K., & Kim, M. K. (2018). Brain waves and emotional responses, according to color stimulation of eye shadows using contrast and similar color arrangement. Asian Journal of Beauty and Cosmetology, 16(4), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2018.0244
  10. Krishna, A., Luangrath, A. W., & Peck, J. (2024). A review of touch research in consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34, 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1413
  11. Messaraa, C., & others. (2020). Clinical evidences of benefits from an advanced skin care routine in comparison with a simple routine. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 19(8), 1993–1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13252
  12. Meunier, M., & others. (2023). Psychobiotics-like Activity as a Novel Treatment against Dry Scalp Related-White Flakes Production with Pogostemon cablin Leaf Extract. Cosmetics, 10(5), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics10050130
  13. Mohammed, A. H., & others. (2023). Exploring the quality of life of cosmetic users: A cross‐sectional analysis from eight Arab countries in the Middle East. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 22(1), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15085
  14. Nguyen, K. L. (2024). The first layer.
  15. Rahmadani, S. M., & Purwaningtyas, M. P. F. (2025). Counter-Narrative or Marketing Gimmick? Defining Male Beauty in Indonesian Skincare Ads from the Lens of Young Male Audience. Masculinities & Social Change, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.15422
  16. Roso, A., Aubert, A., Cambos, S., Vial, F., Schäfer, J., Belin, M., Gabriel, D., & Bize, C. (2024). Contribution of cosmetic ingredients and skin care textures to emotions. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 46(2), 262–283.
  17. Rouzi, K. S., & Afifah, N. (2023). Family Resilience in Forming Children’s Positive Emotions: Perspective of Islamic Educational Psychology. Syekh Nurjati International Conference on Elementary Education (SICEE), 1, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.24235/sicee.v1i0.14539
  18. Saeedi, K. (2025). Emotional Branding: Using Feelings as a Catalyst for Brand Loyalty. 3rd International Conference on Engineering, Innovation & Technology.
  19. Spence, C. F. (2024). Multisensory contributions to skin–cosmetic product interactions. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12975
  20. Traustason, A. M., & Jónsson, O. S. (2024). Analysis of the consumer behavior in the skincare market in Iceland [Thesis]. https://skemman.is/handle/1946/47615
  21. Vergilio, M. M., de Freitas, A. C. P., & da Rocha-Filho, P. A. (2022). Comparative sensory and instrumental analyses and principal components of commercial sunscreens. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 21(2), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14113
  22. Wiranti, B. (2024). Urgensi aspek psikodermatologi dalam perawatan kulit: Memahami keterkaitan emosi dan kesehatan kulit. Mutiara: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.61404/jimi.v2i1.175
  23. Wojciechowska, K., & others. (2021). Comparison of sensory and rheological properties of green cosmetic creams prepared on different natural, ECOCERT and BDIH certificated self-emulsifying bases. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 34(4), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.2478/cipms-2021-0039
  24. Xie, T. (2024). Effectiveness of skincare toward teenage mental health. Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies. https://doi.org/10.61173/n5xzqh45

How to Cite

Dzikrullah, A. M., Setiyadi, D., Puspitaningrum, D., Maulida, I. S. R., & Rouzi, K. S. (2025). ADOLESCENT EMOTIONS AND SKINCARE TEXTURE: A MIXED-METHODS EXPLORATORY STUDY. Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.32806/jkpi.v6i3.923